Post by anik4400 on Feb 22, 2024 2:26:53 GMT -5
Action of the patient that would give rise to the possibility or need for an approach, inquiry and review by public agents." Oliveira said that the police officers' conduct did not respect article 244 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires a well-founded suspicion that the person is in possession of a prohibited weapon or objects or papers that constitute a crime. The well-founded suspicion, he continued, works as a guarantee that the person will not be randomly linked to the commission of a criminal offense being investigated, without having any relationship with the fact. "In this context, as the constitutional guarantee and legal provision contained in the criminal procedural law were not observed, everything that followed the illegal and unmotivated police approach to the patient cannot be considered, as we are facing illicit evidence, with the theory of fruits from the poisoned tree", explained Oliveira.
The way in which public agents acted in approaching the patient, without any suspicious attitude based on his movement, and without a proven prior investigation, does not constitute sufficient grounds to authorize the conclusion that there was a situation of flagrant crime, even if they had drugs were found and seized in the context of continued investigations." The magistrate's conclusion was that the police approach to the patient was illegal and unconstitutional, which does not allow his arrest to be mai Vietnam WhatsApp Number ntained in the act and also leads to the criminal action being suspended for lack of just cause. The decision was made unanimously. Process states that have elections for judges in the United States, candidates' electoral campaigns are increasingly politicized, more aggressive and more expensive — especially for the position of minister of the states' superior courts, which, in the majority, call themselves the Supreme Court .
Polarization of politics reached the Judiciary elections in the United States 123RF The April 4 election for just one Wisconsin Superior Court justice position is an example: instead of announcing their qualifications, the candidates announce their political ideologies and even take positions on a case pending in the lower courts, which will require from the high court a decision that will please voters of one party (Republican or Democrat) and displease "opposing" voters. In commercials, which are flooding the prime time slots of local TV stations, one candidate accuses the other of being a defender of child sexual predators and asks who wants a person like that on the high court. The other responds that the accusations are ridiculous and stupid — and returns accusations, as if it were a political campaign.
The way in which public agents acted in approaching the patient, without any suspicious attitude based on his movement, and without a proven prior investigation, does not constitute sufficient grounds to authorize the conclusion that there was a situation of flagrant crime, even if they had drugs were found and seized in the context of continued investigations." The magistrate's conclusion was that the police approach to the patient was illegal and unconstitutional, which does not allow his arrest to be mai Vietnam WhatsApp Number ntained in the act and also leads to the criminal action being suspended for lack of just cause. The decision was made unanimously. Process states that have elections for judges in the United States, candidates' electoral campaigns are increasingly politicized, more aggressive and more expensive — especially for the position of minister of the states' superior courts, which, in the majority, call themselves the Supreme Court .
Polarization of politics reached the Judiciary elections in the United States 123RF The April 4 election for just one Wisconsin Superior Court justice position is an example: instead of announcing their qualifications, the candidates announce their political ideologies and even take positions on a case pending in the lower courts, which will require from the high court a decision that will please voters of one party (Republican or Democrat) and displease "opposing" voters. In commercials, which are flooding the prime time slots of local TV stations, one candidate accuses the other of being a defender of child sexual predators and asks who wants a person like that on the high court. The other responds that the accusations are ridiculous and stupid — and returns accusations, as if it were a political campaign.